The Death of the Entry-Level SDR

(And the Rise of the GTM Talent Engine)

THESIS
The GTM Talent Engine

Over the past year, I've spoken with more than 1,000 SDR leaders: from early-stage startups to global enterprises. One theme consistently emerges: the traditional sales development role is rapidly becoming obsolete.

For 95% of companies, the entry-level SDR role is no longer financially or operationally viable. The motion that worked in the era of the predictable revenue playbook, hiring more SDRs and generating more pipeline, is no longer sustainable in today's GTM environment. Finding the right headcount is expensive. Buyer behaviour has evolved. AI is automating the low-leverage tasks.

We're at an inflexion point. The question is no longer "How do we optimise SDRs?" It's "What should replace them?"

The Unit Economics No One Wants to Talk About

Let's talk CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost).

For companies selling sub-$50K Annual Contract Value (ACV) products with low Net Revenue Retention (NRR), the maths doesn't work anymore. You're spending $100K+ fully loaded per SDR to book $10K ACV deals, then that's not a scalable model; it's a cost centre disguised as a growth engine.

In these environments, the full-cycle AE is more financially viable. Velocity matters more than segmentation. Let those full-cycle AE's, who may have been SDRs in the past, work on the low ACV value deals. The CAC will be reduced due to the focus on resources within those unnamed accounts. The idea of splitting the sales funnel with a junior resource doesn't hold water when AI can handle first-touch personalisation, list-building, and basic outreach.

AI Is Not the Strategy. It's the Catalyst

Some teams are enthusiastically adopting AI to optimise SDR workflows; that's a step in the right direction. We're missing the more profound shift.

AI is not a strategy. It's a catalyst. The real opportunity isn't automating an outdated model. It's rethinking the purpose of the SDR function entirely.

Instead of viewing SDRs as appointment setters, what if we saw them as the next generation of GTM leaders?

From Appointment Setting to Career Acceleration

Here is my hypothesis: The future of sales development lies not in outbound emails, but in structured rotations across GTM teams.

Much like medical residencies or graduate trainee programmes in finance, the GTM talent engine would bring in high-potential talent and expose them to marketing, partnerships, sales, customer success, and even product.

Over the course of two years, individuals would rotate through multiple roles, developing a holistic understanding of how revenue is generated, retained, and expanded. At the end of the programme, the talent leader and the individual would jointly determine their specialisation, such as AE, CSM, growth marketing, or channel.

After two years of rotation, those who opt into sales and join the SDR function don't enter as entry-level. Their commercial athletes have a cross-functional context. The modern SDR role serves as an on-ramp to strategic AE roles, rather than a stepping stone.

This model does three things:

  1. It creates better, faster-ramping employees with cross-functional intelligence.

  2. It builds a deep internal bench of GTM talent ready to lead and scale.

  3. Employees who see a reason to stay at a company long term, in an organisation that is committed long term to their success.

Sound idealistic? Maybe. However, the long-term ROI has the potential to be astronomical.

The Pushback: “But We Need Pipeline, Now"

Fair point.

Yes, a GTM talent engine academy requires an upfront investment; likely $150–200K per participant over two years, with no revenue contribution. What's the cost of constantly burning out junior SDRs who never progress? What's the hidden churn cost of poor handovers, shallow discovery, and siloed GTM execution?

By year three, these alumni are driving deals, influencing strategy, and making meaningful contributions to the pipeline from day one in their roles. It'sn't just about pipeline, it's about capability compounding.

And for those worried about the short-term pipeline, That's where AI-enabled automation, PLG conversion, and full-cycle reps come. We're not removing pipeline generation, we're evolving who (or what) is responsible for it.

It's critical that there is executive-level alignment and that their reporting lines are enforcing this. This shift will create lags, so there needs to be effective expectation management within the revenue functions beforehand, to ensure no disruption.

Coaching and management are critical.

A Reimagined SDR Function

So what becomes of the SDR role?

I see two emerging paths:

  • Strategic SDRs: Aligned to key accounts, focused on multi-threading, working closely with AEs to penetrate and expand. These are GTM engine alums, future AEs in training.

  • SDRs-as-Specialists: Former AEs don't want the full number but thrive in early-stage deal orchestration. Think complex enterprise motions where deal navigation is everything.

What won't see: rows of entry-level SDRs smiling and dialling to generate top-of-funnel for SMB products. That model is obsolete.

Most importantly, there will be no inbound or outbound split. It will be all bound SDRs who are focused on a targeted list of named accounts, where marketing dollars are invested in the accounts that generate the most ACV for the business. All non-named account requests go through an AI workflow before being assigned to a full-cycle AE.

What Comes Next

This won't happen overnight. It requires GTM leaders to think differently about headcount, talent development, and pipeline planning. But for companies willing to pilot this model, the payoff is clear:

  • Better talent

  • Lower attrition

  • Higher CAC efficiency

  • Cross-functional fluency

And a truly modern GTM org.

The future of sales development isn’t outbound. It’s rotational. It's strategic.

EVENTS
What's happening in the community?

LASTLY
Whenever you’re ready, here are two ways I could help you

Our Community for European-based SDR leaders: SDR leaders of EMEA

Our Community for North American-based SDR leaders: SDR Leaders of USA

Reply

or to participate.