Most AI newsletters summarize headlines. MavSource is different.
We aggregate updates from all major AI newsletters, podcasts, company news, AI labs, public and private company activity, GitHub projects, funding rounds, earnings calls, and investor letters — hundreds of sources every day. Then we summarize what matters, analyze emerging trends, and add our own founder commentary so you understand why a development may matter — not just what happened.
One 5-minute email, every morning. Built for investors, founders, and operators who want to understand AI as a business, technology, and market trend — not just another news cycle.
The daily email is free. It's also the entry point to a deeper intelligence product covering watchlists, public-company read-throughs, startup trackers, and investor-letter tracking.
Anyone can talk the talk in an SDR Manager Interview
The polished candidate has a story for every competency. They've rehearsed the coaching answer, the pipeline answer, the "tell me about a conflict" answer. They make eye contact, they land the punchline, and most hiring managers walk away impressed by exactly the wrong thing: fluency.
Here's the problem with hiring on fluency. A bad SDR rep costs you one quota. A bad SDR manager costs you the whole team's quota, plus the good reps who quietly start interviewing elsewhere. It's the most expensive hire on the floor and the one we screen for the loosest.
The hard part isn't finding someone who sounds like a leader. It's telling the operator from the performer before they're running your team.
Andrew kicked off a thread on exactly this in the community last week, favourite questions for interviewing an SDR/BDR manager candidate, and the answers from the room were good enough to deserve a wider audience.
Start with examples, not opinions
Courtney makes the point that most candidates can talk the talk, so she leans on example-based questions to remove the doubt: how they've actually coached a rep through a performance issue, the creative tactics they've run with a team, how they've handled cross-department collaboration. The rule of thumb: if a candidate can't reach for a specific, named example in about ten seconds, the polish was covering for a lack of reps. Good managers have scar tissue, and scar tissue comes with stories.
Then break the script
Nick takes it a step further. When the example answers start sounding too rehearsed, he switches to abstract questions designed to get inside how a candidate actually thinks:
"If your team was a machine, what part would most likely break first?": Tests for honest, org-level self-awareness. A performer tells you nothing's broken. An operator already knows the weak joint.
"If I watched your team for one week without looking at dashboards, how would I know they were well-managed?": Tests whether their coaching, systems and process hold up when there's no number to hide behind.
"What would your reps say you refused to let become their problem?": Tests how they actually see their own leadership, and whether they shield their team or expose it.
You can't pre-write answers to those. That's the entire point.
Make them sit in a failure
My own go-to is blunter: "Tell me about a time you failed." It's simple, but how someone narrates a failure tells you everything about whether they own outcomes or outsource blame. The candidates who reach for "my last company didn't give me the resources" are telling you how they'll explain a missed quarter to you next year.
And the one I'd steal next
Elric asks about a candidate's issue-diagnosis framework, how they think about their org and find the levers to pull. It's the sharpest of the lot, because great managers don't react to symptoms. They diagnose. A manager who treats a pipeline dip by telling reps to "make more calls" is guessing. One who can walk you through how they'd isolate the actual cause is managing.
The through-line across every one of these questions: you're not testing for the best story. You're testing for self-awareness and systems thinking, the two things that separate a manager who scales a team from one who just supervises it.
Which, conveniently, is also the thing that decides who gets promoted past Senior Manager. More on that below.
Funnel EMEA: Early Bird is open
Most SDR leaders get promoted into management without anyone teaching them how the layer above thinks. They hit a ceiling around Senior Manager, sometimes Director, and don't know why.
Here's what separates the ones who break through.
They learn to think in budget, not headcount. Most SDR leaders justify resources by saying "I need more SDRs to hit pipeline targets." VPs justify resources by saying "Here's the cost of acquisition, here's the marginal pipeline ROI per rep, here's what cutting the team would do to next year's plan." Same ask, completely different conversation.
They own a forecast, not just a quota. Hitting pipeline is table stakes. Forecasting it accurately, defending the number to the CFO, and adjusting the plan when reality diverges is the actual skill. Most SDR leaders never learn it because no one teaches it.
They build hiring plans that survive board meetings. Anyone can ask for 5 more SDRs. Few can map those 5 SDRs to revenue, payback period, and capacity calculations the board will actually approve.
They frame risk to execs without losing political capital. "We're going to miss" is not a risk frame. "Here are three scenarios with probabilities, here's what we're doing about each one, and here's what I need from you" is.
None of this is taught in standard SDR leadership content. Most of it is learned by watching, getting it wrong, and watching again.
This is exactly what we built Day 0 of Funnel EMEA around.
The "Think Like a VP Before You Are One" workshop walks through all four. You leave with a 1-page framework you can use the Monday after.
14-15 October, London
SDR leaders only, Manager up
Day 0 capped at 75 (closed door)
Early Bird pricing through 30 June. €229 for the 2-day, €179 for the 1-day



